From: James Gray <james@...>
Date: 2009-05-18T08:58:21+09:00
Subject: Re: Berkeley DB or Store equivalent?

On May 17, 2009, at 6:45 PM, Mk 27 wrote:

> James Gray wrote:
>> On May 17, 2009, at 1:16 PM, Mk 27 wrote:
>>
>>> Looks like SQlite would be better...is there a ruby module for that
>>> (guess I'll have to go google)?
>>
>> Multiple libraries, yes.  I recommend Amalgalite.
>>
>> James Edward Gray II
>
> Glancing at Amalgalite it looks exactly like  
> "SQLite3::Database" (which
> I just starting using today).  Any other (justified) opinions on this?
> Or does it not matter much?

Amalgalite embeds SQLite inside of it's extension and thus does not  
rely on an external install.  It also activates some new features in  
it's compile that are nice to have.

James Edward Gray II