From: Mark Thomas <mark@...>
Date: 2009-05-15T09:45:02+09:00
Subject: Re: Syntactic sugar idea

On May 14, 6:31 pm, Daniel Berger <djber...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 13, 8:42 pm, Daniel DeLorme <dan...@dan42.com> wrote:
>
> > It seems that often an object will be passed into a block only to invoke
> > a method of that object:
> >    arr.map{ |obj| obj.some_method }
>
> > So I had the (weird? stupid?) thought that it would be nice to have some
> > syntactic sugar like this:
> >    arr.map{ .some_method }
>
> require 'enumerable/extra'
>
> arr.map(:some_method)
>
> Regards,
>
> Dan

Cool! What would it take to make this 1.9 compatible?