From: Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>
Date: 2009-05-15T07:31:24+09:00
Subject: Re: Syntactic sugar idea



On May 13, 8:42 pm, Daniel DeLorme <dan...@dan42.com> wrote:
> It seems that often an object will be passed into a block only to invoke
> a method of that object:
>    arr.map{ |obj| obj.some_method }
>
> So I had the (weird? stupid?) thought that it would be nice to have some
> syntactic sugar like this:
>    arr.map{ .some_method }

require 'enumerable/extra'

arr.map(:some_method)

Regards,

Dan