From: LAMBEAU Bernard <blambeau@...>
Date: 2009-04-13T16:21:36+09:00
Subject: Re: more efficient date range comparison

Oops, you are perfectly right ... sorry!

blambeau

On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 9:16 AM, LAMBEAU Bernard <blambeau@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's a OR, not a AND, so it seems correct ... no? Seems to be the
> classical overlap operator on simple intervals.
>
> blambeau
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Albert Schlef <albertschlef@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dave Woodworth wrote:
>>>       conflicts += 1 if my_rec.include?(start) ||
>>> my_rec.include?(finish)
>>
>> Off topic: I think you have a bug here. If my_rec is, say, 20..40, and
>> other_rec is, say, 10..50, your test won't detect this conflict (because
>> neither 10 nor 50 are included in the my_rec range).
>> --
>> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>>
>>
>
>