From: "Iñaki Baz Castillo" Date: 2009-04-06T04:32:29+09:00 Subject: Re: [ANN] Localmemcache-0.2.1: The beauty of memcached. For local data. Blazingly fast. El Domingo 05 Abril 2009, Sven C. Koehler escribió: > Hi, > > this release addresses some bugs that people were experiencing and brings > speed improvements. Hi, I'm trying to install it in my 64 bits Ubuntu host with Ruby1.9.1 installed from sources in /usr/local. This is the error output I get after doing "gem install localmemcache": /usr/local/bin/ruby1.9 extconf.rb install localmemcache checking for main() in -lrt... *** extconf.rb failed *** Could not create Makefile due to some reason, probably lack of necessary libraries and/or headers. Check the mkmf.log file for more details. You may need configuration options. Provided configuration options: --with-opt-dir --without-opt-dir --with-opt-include --without-opt-include=${opt-dir}/include --with-opt-lib --without-opt-lib=${opt-dir}/lib --with-make-prog --without-make-prog --srcdir=. --curdir --ruby=/usr/local/bin/ruby1.9 --with-rtlib --without-rtlib /usr/local/lib/ruby1.9/1.9.1/mkmf.rb:362:in `try_do': The complier failed to generate an executable file. (RuntimeError) You have to install development tools first. from /usr/local/lib/ruby1.9/1.9.1/mkmf.rb:415:in `try_link0' from /usr/local/lib/ruby1.9/1.9.1/mkmf.rb:419:in `try_link' from /usr/local/lib/ruby1.9/1.9.1/mkmf.rb:527:in `try_func' from /usr/local/lib/ruby1.9/1.9.1/mkmf.rb:723:in `block in have_library' from /usr/local/lib/ruby1.9/1.9.1/mkmf.rb:668:in `block in checking_for' from /usr/local/lib/ruby1.9/1.9.1/mkmf.rb:274:in `block (2 levels) in postpone' from /usr/local/lib/ruby1.9/1.9.1/mkmf.rb:248:in `open' from /usr/local/lib/ruby1.9/1.9.1/mkmf.rb:274:in `block in postpone' from /usr/local/lib/ruby1.9/1.9.1/mkmf.rb:248:in `open' from /usr/local/lib/ruby1.9/1.9.1/mkmf.rb:270:in `postpone' from /usr/local/lib/ruby1.9/1.9.1/mkmf.rb:667:in `checking_for' from /usr/local/lib/ruby1.9/1.9.1/mkmf.rb:718:in `have_library' from extconf.rb:13:in `
' mkmf.log is empty. What could I check? Thanks. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo