From: "ara.t.howard" Date: 2009-04-06T00:29:51+09:00 Subject: Re: tagz and entities On Apr 3, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Joel VanderWerf wrote: > Thanks. That seems a bit arbitrary since these methods are the same > for strings. It's something you just have to remember, but then > forget when you come back to the code after a while. > yeah i can see that. i was thinking more of erb's concat - which appends literal objects. > Would it be possible for the object returned by #tagz to have a > method, say #literally or #unescaped, which returns an object which > delegates back to the original. On the original Tagz::Document, #<< > and #concat have the same quoting behavior. On the delegator, they > do not quote. > that is kinds of how it works already. def << string case string when Document super string.to_s else super XChar.escape(string.to_s) end self end and anything returned by tagz *is* a document. you can even do tagz << tagz(' not escaped ') maybe i'll just reserver #write of unescaped writing - there needs to be one shortcut i think. a @ http://codeforpeople.com/ -- we can deny everything, except that we have the possibility of being better. simply reflect on that. h.h. the 14th dalai lama