From: Phlip <phlip2005@...>
Date: 2009-03-30T04:29:57+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] testy.rb - ruby testing that's mad at the world

James Gray wrote:

> I really feel counting the errors and reading the output are both  
> things better handled by defining a good interface for the results  
> writer.  If I could just define some trivial class with methods like  
> test_passed(), test_failed(), test_errored_out(), and tests_finished()  
> then just plug that in, I could easily do anything I want.

What, besides instantly fix it (or revert) do you want to do with an error 
message from a broken test?