From: "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...>
Date: 2009-03-25T04:30:12+09:00
Subject: Re: tagz-5.0.0


On Mar 24, 2009, at 12:46 PM, matt neuburg wrote:

> Sorry, I knew about this approach and was avoiding it. I think it was
> the term "globally" that had me scared off. This usually means, uh,
> globally. But thanks to your hint, I see it is just an include like  
> any
> other. So what I really want to do is more like this:

yeah.  i means 'globally' in the target scope.  aka - a_{} works  
outside the tagz{} context


> b = BindingMaker.new
> class << b; include Tagz.globally; end
>
> This way I can use Tagz in that instance of the BindingMaker and  
> nothing
> else in my universe is affected. This should be perfect! Thx for the
> nudge - m.


clever!


a @ http://codeforpeople.com/
--
we can deny everything, except that we have the possibility of being  
better. simply reflect on that.
h.h. the 14th dalai lama