From: Peter Booth <pbooth@...>
Date: 2009-03-08T08:51:56+09:00
Subject: Re: Static web site generators

I did a similar survey a few months ago and went with nanoc because  
the documentation was good. I'm very happy with it and it's easily the  
most productive static site development tool ive encountered.

Make sure you have a firefox with the web developer tools installed.

Peter Booth
(917) 445 5663 peter_booth@mac.com

On Mar 7, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Brian Adkins <lojicdotcom@gmail.com> wrote:

> After Googling a bit, it appears that nanoc, webby & webgen seem to be
> the prominent Ruby candidates for tools to generate static web sites.
>
> Any recommendations/warnings from folks who have used any of them?
>
> -- 
> Brian Adkins
> http://lojic.com/
>