From: trans <transfire@...>
Date: 2009-03-08T07:27:20+09:00
Subject: Re: Static web site generators



On Mar 7, 5:18 pm, Brian Adkins <lojicdot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> After Googling a bit, it appears that nanoc, webby & webgen seem to be
> the prominent Ruby candidates for tools to generate static web sites.
>
> Any recommendations/warnings from folks who have used any of them?

There certainly nothing wrong with static site generation --in some
ways static sites are better. And those are all good tools and there
are others as well. But, I always find myself moving to a dynamic site
in the end. It's just a hell of a lot more convenient.

I would be cool if some of these static site generators had a cache
and generate on demand mode.

T.