From: Tom Cloyd Date: 2009-03-08T07:25:31+09:00 Subject: Re: Static web site generators Brian Adkins wrote: > After Googling a bit, it appears that nanoc, webby & webgen seem to be > the prominent Ruby candidates for tools to generate static web sites. > > Any recommendations/warnings from folks who have used any of them? > > I'll jump right up and say that there cannot be enough praise for Webby. I use it for a great many sites, including a number I've designed professionally, and all my personal sites. It's wonderfully designed, easy to use, with a lively and helpful discussion list, and Tim P., the developer, couldn't be a more helpful fellow. You might wanna give it a whirl. If you do, make free use of the discussion list, to help you move things along fast, but you may not need it at all. t. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Tom Cloyd, MS MA, LMHC - Private practice Psychotherapist Bellingham, Washington, U.S.A: (360) 920-1226 << tc@tomcloyd.com >> (email) << TomCloyd.com >> (website) << sleightmind.wordpress.com >> (mental health weblog) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~