From: "Horacio López" <vruz@...>
Date: 2002-01-30T10:27:15+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby and Morphic?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alexander Schofield" <pcs3@mailhost.njit.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>; <undisclosed-recipients:>
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:20 PM
Subject: Re: Ruby and Morphic?


> Lyle Johnson wrote:
> > toolkits (couldn't find any hits in the RAA or on google.com).
> > 
> > Thanks in advance for any thoughts on this...
> 
> It's slow, but if you can live with that it's an excellent OO API. 
> Actually morphic did not originate with Smalltalk and Squeak, but with a
> Prototype-based language called Self:
> http://research.sun.com/research/self/release_4.1/release.html
> Basically a pure OO language with no classes and slightly different
> terminology than smalltalk, but a very similar syntax and workbench. 
> You might want to go to the original source for more information on
> morphic before you make any decisions.
> HTH,
> 
> -- 
> Alexander Schofield

The original Morphic for Self  runs only on some Mac OSes, right ?

cheers,
                   vruz