From: Harry Ohlsen <harryo@...>
Date: 2002-01-29T06:58:55+09:00
Subject: Re: Reviews solicited for Ruby article

In article <Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0112121016070.5400-100000@ratdog.stok.co.uk>,
"Mike Stok" <mike@stok.co.uk> wrote:

> You are wrong ... The (0) after the Hash.new is significant see
> http://www.rubycentral.com/book/ref_c_hash.html#new.  Here's an irb
> transcript:

Ah!  I see.  So, the 0 is the value given to any key that's not been
initialised.  Great.  Thanks for the clarification.

Harry O.