From: Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...>
Date: 2009-01-31T01:46:36+09:00
Subject: Re: Object#singleton_class in Ruby 1.9?


On Jan 30, 2009, at 10:53 AM, James Gray wrote:
> I'm for singleton_class.  It's what the official documentation has  
> used for a long time now.  It's also not like it will be the only  
> overloaded term in computing.


eigenton_class?  :-)

eigen_class or singleton_class doesn't really matter to
me at this point but I do feel strongly that the object
returned by:

	(class <<obj; self; end)

should be available via a simple method call rather
than only via that expression.

Gary Wright