From: Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@...>
Date: 2009-01-30T03:02:25+09:00
Subject: Re: RDoc 2.3 now with Darkfish, without CHM and extra HTML templates

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Martin DeMello
<martindemello@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
>> On Jan 29, 2009, at 3:24, Martin DeMello <martindemello@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The RDoc documentation is a pretty bad sample, since the majority of
>>> the methods say 'not documented'. I suggest putting a small but
>>> well-documented project on the site purely to act as a demo.
>>
>> Patches welcome
>
> Will sift rubyforge for candidates. Prawn looks pretty good in terms
> of coverage, though perhaps something smaller would be better.

Now that prawn has been split out into various extensions, prawn-core
isn't too bad.
http://prawn.majesticseacreature.com/docs/prawn-core/

I'll probably give the latest RDoc a try soon, and post here if I do.

-greg


-- 
Technical Blaag at: http://blog.majesticseacreature.com
 Non-tech stuff at: http://metametta.blogspot.com
"Ruby Best Practices"  Book now in O'Reilly Roughcuts:
http://rubybestpractices.com