From: Martin DeMello Date: 2009-01-30T01:28:10+09:00 Subject: Re: RDoc 2.3 now with Darkfish, without CHM and extra HTML templates On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Eric Hodel wrote: > On Jan 29, 2009, at 3:24, Martin DeMello wrote: >> >> The RDoc documentation is a pretty bad sample, since the majority of >> the methods say 'not documented'. I suggest putting a small but >> well-documented project on the site purely to act as a demo. > > Patches welcome Will sift rubyforge for candidates. Prawn looks pretty good in terms of coverage, though perhaps something smaller would be better. martin