From: Robert Dober Date: 2009-01-16T18:21:10+09:00 Subject: Re: Why Ruby? On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Mike Stephens wrote: > Robert Dober wrote: > >> Why would Ruby misfit large structured projects? > > I didn't mean to imply Java is stodgy and Ruby is fluid. It was just > that currently Java and C# are the corporate OO standards, so people > will always want to know why you're not using one of those. You thus > have to use some spin; create some clear blue water. Rails is certainly > one way of getting around the Architecture Standards Manual but I guess > they'll soon be a Java version if there isn't one already. > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > Sorry Mike I must be on a different planet:( Do we agree that Ruby is fit for large projects? I on my side agree completely with what you say here, I probably misunderstood something earlier on. Cheers Robert > -- It is change, continuing change, inevitable change, that is the dominant factor in society today. No sensible decision can be made any longer without taking into account not only the world as it is, but the world as it will be ... ~ Isaac Asimov