From: Phlip <phlip2005@...>
Date: 2009-01-16T09:28:58+09:00
Subject: Re: 10 things to be aware of in 1.8 -> 1.9 transition

David A. Black wrote:

> It's cool but it doesn't belong on the original list, because it's not
> something that might make your existing code fail to work, which is
> (mostly :-) what the list is. The mention of ordered hashes is
> questionable on those grounds too in fact.

Maybe we need two lists:

  - warnings, gotchas, and incompatibilities
  - new conveniences and benefits