From: William James <w_a_x_man@...>
Date: 2009-01-15T19:39:02+09:00
Subject: Re: Why do true and false have separate classes

Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote:

> Mike Gold <mike.gold.4433@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote:
> >> It's also a way to remember that Ruby is just a lisp that
> >> has been Matzacred.
> > 
> > Is the intended pun "massacred lisp" ... or "Matz' sacred lisp"?
> 
> Both are true.

Wrong.  Neither is true.  That is, each is either false or nil.
Understand?

Acolytes of Commune Lisp are incapable of comprehending any language
that isn't as ancient as COBOL, FORTRAN, LISP, or APL.

Give one of them like this one an inch, and he will erase your
hard drive:

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/msg/1d85f2e1ec5f6e0b