From: Robert Dober <robert.dober@...>
Date: 2009-01-15T05:04:55+09:00
Subject: Re: Why Ruby?

On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Mike Stephens <rubfor@recitel.net> wrote:
> Thanks Phlip.
>
> If I add all the responses together I think we get Ruby can be
> positioned for agile rapid applications, prototyping etc. Java is
> typically more long-winded but suitable for big expensive structured
> mainstream projects requiring all the bureacratic strategic
> architectures and policies.
Why would Ruby misfit large structured projects (whatever mainstream
is, probably that part of the water racing fastest towards the falls)
as long TDD/BDD is applicable?

Cheers
Robert
>



-- 
It is change, continuing change, inevitable change, that is the
dominant factor in society today. No sensible decision can be made any
longer without taking into account not only the world as it is, but
the world as it will be ... ~ Isaac Asimov