From: GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@...>
Date: 2002-01-26T17:11:09+09:00
Subject: Re: RDoc: eval("class A; ... end")

In message "Re: RDoc: eval("class A; ... end")"
    on Fri, 25 Jan 2002 12:13:22 +0900,
    "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@keynauts.com> writes:

> > I'd like to use the great tool RDoc but I have a problem. 
> > There is a set of classes defined dinamically by eval. 
> > Should I defiene statically these classes? 
> > or Does the RDoc support classes defined-by-eval?
> Extracting real classes from src by running its code
> at building doc time, seems too much I think.  You
> must write descriptions for above each classes and dig
> it into your code.  You could use :include: for this
> purpose for now.
> 
> But... do you think this simple?

Oh, that is not simple.  Maybe dynamically defined class is the source
of complexty.  

I would wait the next release from Dave :)

-- Gotoken