From: "Chr. Rippel" <chr_news@...>
Date: 2002-01-25T16:31:43+09:00
Subject: Re: ruby 2.0; rubicon

"ts" <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> wrote,
....
>  You just need to write
>
>    class A
>       def a
>          b
>       end
>       def b
>          a
>       end
>    end
>
>  if you really want an infinite loop.
>
>  With a dynamic algorithm it's easy to have infinite loop when you make the
>  include, this is not the case actually.

I guess my point was that this particular loop was created by the include
process - at which point you could/should point out that the halting problem
is undecidable anyway - so lets scratch this point. It probably simply offends
my personal esthetics that something like

   (A <=> B) == (B <=> A ) # => true

is possible (which is nothing compared to the pain thinking about the fact
that Complex sports a  #<=> implemenation;-)))

 /Christoph