From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...>
Date: 2002-01-24T19:53:49+09:00
Subject: Re: Array.last Weirdness

Hi Pit,


> if you define the missing "last=" method using the existing "[]=" 
> method, you get the desired behaviour:


I know. It's just that the original poster wouldn't have experienced his 
surprise, if Array#last= would be built-in, so it would be nice if it 
would be built-in;
and if a setter could be expected for every setter, where it makes 
sense, like in this case.

But that's MHO :)


Tobi

-- 
http://www.pinkjuice.com/