From: Michael Furmaniuk <mfurmaniuk@...>
Date: 2008-12-10T08:35:59+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby Test Frameworks

Richard Conroy wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> 
> wrote:
> Shoulda and RSpec I think are tackling different needs. The learning
> curve is greater
> and there is more magic involved, but I suspect that test
> organisation, and consolidation
> of reporting is probably a greater priority than natural language test
> description.

Yes, natural language test description is nice, but if it comes at the 
expense of reporting and organization I can deal with the odd 
description.  I had looked a little at RSpec but not in depth, and 
Shoulda I saw referenced in a page somewhere but it did not seem a fit 
for what I was looking for, I will check them more in depth.

>> You can call actual C using RubyInline or FFI.
> 
> In addition, check out JtestR for plain old Java testing (it works 
> great).

Thanks for these, and the other ideas, I will check them out!
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.