From: Sean Russell <ser@...>
Date: 2002-01-24T06:55:01+09:00
Subject: RE: RANT: Ruby GUI API

Curt Hibbs wrote:

> But I think the fault is not in the concept, but in Mozilla's
> implementation. Its trying to be a souped up HTML and as such heavily
> mixes UI definition and UI behavior in the XUL tags, themselves. A better
> approach would be to let the XUL simply define the UI components and their
> layout, and completely separating out behavior.

Can we get a list of the alternatives?

* XUL
* XForms
* Glade
....

I'm really not up on all of the GUI meta-definition languages out there.

-- 
--- SER