From: Tobias DiPasquale <anany@...>
Date: 2002-01-23T19:00:23+09:00
Subject: [POLL]: ruby-talk seperation

Hi all,

I am proposing a poll in which people will reply to this posting and list
the top five lists that they would like to see if a seperation of
ruby-talk should (would) occur. This will help get a better feel for
where people's interests lie, and also help to split the traffic up
better between the newly created lists. Please reply with your top five
lists, and any comments that you desire, as well.

You can reply to this post on the mailing list, or to me personally, and
I will compile the results and report back to the mailing list in one
week's time. At such time, I will contact the maintainer of the ruby-talk
ML and see what can be done about implementing the new lists.

Those people that already suggested new lists need not reply again, but
can if they want to. Participation is, of course, optional.

Thanks in advance!
-- 
<< T o b i a s   D i P a s q u a l e >>
anany@ece.villanova.edu | tdipas01@villanova.edu | toby@khenry.com

"Bill Gates comes to visit SoftImage and during an employee Q/A someone asks 
'Since the Internet is all about free software, how come Microsoft is still 
charging for it?'"
 -- Adam Barr, 
    __Proudly Serving My Corporate Masters__