From: brabuhr@...
Date: 2008-11-26T07:34:24+09:00
Subject: Re: [QUIZ] Befunge (#184)

On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Matthew Moss <matt@moss.name> wrote:
> If you're going to fix the arg order of - and /, why wouldn't you do the
> same for + and *?
>
> Popping b first, then a, isn't a workaround; it's the correct method
> according to spec. Why make + and * an exception to that?

Because I never read the spec?  :-)
(Though I did skim the wikipedia page.)

But, yeah, plus it would be much nicer to do them all at once (and
maybe throw % in too).