From: Rolando Abarca <funkaster@...>
Date: 2008-11-18T03:40:17+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby equivalent to `find . -perm -g+rw -ls`

On Nov 17, 2008, at 3:31 PM, Bil Kleb wrote:

> You don't need the '? true : nil' part AFAICT -- the
> first conditional satisfies select.

that's correct.

> Regards,
> --
> http://twitter.com/bil_kleb


regards,
-- 
Rolando Abarca M.