From: Michael Granger Date: 2008-09-27T13:02:21+09:00 Subject: Re: [ANN] darkfish-rdoc 1.1.5 On Sep 26, 2008, at 3:14 PM, Eric Hodel wrote: > On Sep 25, 2008, at 23:23 PM, ged@FaerieMUD.org wrote: > >> > I love you. Aw, I'm pretty fond of you, too! :) > From the README: > >> Because of the way Rdoc and Rubygems work, there's currently no way >> to make the >> Darkfish generator available to Rdoc from the command line 'rdoc' >> tool if you >> have it installed as a gem, but if you install it as a regular Ruby >> library >> (via 'rake install'), you can do this: >> >> $ rdoc -w 4 -SHN -f darkfish -m README README lib >> >> I'm trying to figure out how to resolve this for the gem. >> Suggestions welcomed. > > I've added code to RubyGems itself to help gem authors automatically > pull in extensions, but it'll take another release of RDoc to > implement it. Yay! > Would you consider allowing RDoc to replace its current HTML > generator with Darkfish? (I did a cursory review, and it seems > nice, I will need to refactor the Numeric.extend to avoid pollution, > though.) Of course! It still generates invalid HTML under a few circumstances I noticed recently, so I'd like to clean those up, but feel free to use it however you'd like. -- Michael Granger Rubymage, Architect, Believer The FaerieMUD Consortium