From: Gregory Brown Date: 2008-09-16T22:21:17+09:00 Subject: Re: 1.9 On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Rick DeNatale wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:58 PM, David Masover wrote: > No, Matz announced about a year ago that instead of even minor version > numbers indicating production vs. experimental/development, a teeny version > number > 0 would be the new indication, So 1.9.1 will be production. > > Seems he is afraid of running out of digits. Mostly unrelated, but it actually may be so. Matz hates the idea of something like 1.8.10, though I don't exactly remember the story about it. I think it has to do with comparison of version numbers as strings, or something else. Maybe someone here knows the back story. -greg -- Technical Blaag at: http://blog.majesticseacreature.com | Non-tech stuff at: http://metametta.blogspot.com