From: Jim Freeze <jfreeze@...>
Date: 2002-01-17T06:23:19+09:00
Subject: Re: Protecting a member hash

On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 06:01:18AM +0900, Alan Chen wrote:
> 
> Well you could declare []= private or protected in HashProtector.
> Then access []= via send inside class test.  I'd advise commenting
> why you're bypassing the protection mechanisms with set_h.

Not a bad idea, but I tend to shy away from such techniques since
this may end up going away with 2.0.


-- 
Jim Freeze
Today is a fine day for Ruby programming.
www.freeze.org