From: Martin DeMello Date: 2008-09-10T07:52:34+09:00 Subject: Re: Drake: Distributed Rake On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 3:38 PM, . wrote: > > Do we want > > task :a => :x > task :a => :y > task :a => :z > > to be equivalent to > > task :a => :z > task :a => :x > task :a => :y > > Yes or no? If a programmer wants them to mean different things, how > shall we accommodate him? Yes! If you want it differently, you write in the ordering explicitly task :a => :z task :z => :y task :y => :x You have no reason to expect one operation to come before another if there is not an explicit dependency chain between them martin