From: James Coglan <jcoglan@...>
Date: 2008-09-05T18:16:05+09:00
Subject: Re: method chaining via symbols

------=_Part_53289_13804063.1220606509469
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

>
> So anyways I was thinking how it would work if you could do something like
> this:
>
>  send(:method1:method2:method3)
>
> Arguments would be passed like normal, and the argument to a chained
> method would be the result of the last method call.



Actually, could you clarify how this should be expanded? Should it turn
into:

obj.method3( obj.method2( obj.method1 ) )

or:

obj.method1.method2.method3

------=_Part_53289_13804063.1220606509469--