From: Charles Turner <vze26m98@...>
Date: 2008-08-30T04:56:21+09:00
Subject: Re: Use of  "next" in Ruby 1.9?

On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:41:08 +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:

> next() doesn't take a block.

Thanks. That tidbit seems like an omission from Flanagan's book, 
although I suppose it's not easy to track everything going on with 1.9.

Would that make next() the only enumerable() that doesn't take a block?

Best, Charles