From: Dan Schmidt <dfan@...>
Date: 2002-01-16T00:53:15+09:00
Subject: Re: a wishlist for ruby 2.0

"Daniel Berger" <djberg96@hotmail.com> writes:

| > > * Eliminate separate methods for "modify receiver in place" with
| > > some other mechanism.  Either modify the receiver based on
| > > calling context (void == modify, rvalue == don't modify), or
| > > provide a special generic method that modifies the receiver.
|
| If a method is called as part of a chain, it modifies the receiver.

This is the opposite of what I'd expect.

-- 
http://www.dfan.org