From: MenTaLguY <mental@...>
Date: 2008-08-18T12:15:10+09:00
Subject: Re: Security in use of contants

--=-NZawUFRSt7etQxU+sUJv
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 12:06 +0900, loolek wrote:
> I think this is not the question of ruby. Imagine this -> there is a
> constant that holds the value that triggers the cooler sticks in a
> nuclear power plant. Than the bad guy "overwrites" it, what comes
> next ?

To be blunt, this is a nonissue.  If the "bad guy" is in a position to
redefine a Ruby constant, he is capable of doing much worse things with
less trouble.

-mental

--=-NZawUFRSt7etQxU+sUJv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBIqOoREpMFVe94r24RAqlEAJ9LHSIGt9jEH6IaQdMJa6bo9CCRmQCfcFS7
DgWH+ZtDACkYuYfDPYtr/uQ=
=MA4H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-NZawUFRSt7etQxU+sUJv--