From: Dejan Dimic Date: 2008-08-18T04:06:53+09:00 Subject: Re: Security in use of contants On Aug 17, 8:36 pm, Phlip wrote: > Kless wrote: > > Is secure use constants? > > > I come from Python and it isn't recommended there. > > Use constants to avoid repeating a literal with the same meaning, such as '42', > in various locations in your code. > > What do you mean by "secure"? Neither Ruby nor Python are secure from reverse > engineering, because all the source is hanging out visible for all to see! > > -- >    Phlip How do you come up with this question? CONSTANTS are perhaps more secure in comparison to loops. :-) Be avare of the interations.