From: Trans <transfire@...>
Date: 2008-08-16T21:33:22+09:00
Subject: Re: More autoload...



On Aug 16, 1:18 am, David Masover <ni...@slaphack.com> wrote:

> So, in other words, autoload is either using its own interpretation of
> require, or it's hardcoding (in C) a call to the original require, rather
> than going through the Ruby code. (I wonder how this would have cooperated
> with Rubygems, had that not been included?)

I reported this bug a long time ago. It is a serious issue with one of
my programs. Because of it I am forced never to use autoload, and tell
all users of my program that they must do the same. I would have
expected this to be fixed for 1.9, and back-ported. It's disappointing
to hear it still remains an issue.

T.