From: Tommy Morgan <tommy.morgan@...>
Date: 2008-08-14T05:30:43+09:00
Subject: Re: Redefine "method" method

------=_Part_43148_27356708.1218659602332
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Technically, it seems that you could do something along the lines of the
following:

class Test
  class << self
    undef_method "method"
  end
end

Although... that really seems like a bad idea. I don't know enough about th=
e
internals to say whether or not anything would break (I poked at it a littl=
e
and haven't tripped across any side effects, but it seems like there should
be).

Any chance you could just use a different name for your method?

--Tommy M.

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 4:10 PM, I=F1aki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote=
:

> Hi, I'd like to have a method called "method" in some classes, but
> since "method" is a Ruby method present in any class I would like if it
> could
> originate any problem.
>
> --
> I=F1aki Baz Castillo
>
>

------=_Part_43148_27356708.1218659602332--