From: Farrel Lifson Date: 2008-08-09T22:42:57+09:00 Subject: Re: Ruby Spec... 2008/8/9 Mayuresh Kathe : > I read the following on wikipedia; > There is currently no specification of the Ruby language, so the > original implementation is considered to be the de facto reference. > > I'm no authority on these matters, but wouldn't it be safer to draft a > specification formally? Rubinius and JRuby use a shared RSpec suite which they use to test compatiability. It's not the Official Spec(tm) but I think it's the closest to one. Farrel -- Aimred - Ruby Development and Consulting http://www.aimred.com