From: Horacio Lopez <vruz@...>
Date: 2002-01-13T09:18:09+09:00
Subject: Re: RCRCR

*snip*

> I think that if anything, these should just be a "category" field in a
> particular RCR.  I.e. a given RCR can be an alteration, enhancement,
> optimization, etc.
>
> The problem with ditching RCR in favor of more top level categories is
> that joe user who files his idea into the system may not even know if
> his idea is an enhancement or an alteration, etc.

Joe user may not tell the difference between optimizing the
Ruby interpreter and optimizing his application first.

Joe user will rarely write RCRs.

More deeply involved users will have the skills to understand
the implications of the request.

Joe user, won't.

An RCR is not a wishlist, wishlists can be posted in
ruby-talk, so that another more knowledgeable developer
evaluates if the wishlist is worth writing an RCR.

Guys, please correct me if I am wrong, I may not
be seeing the whole picture.

cheers,
         vruz


-- 
# Horacio Lopez
# vruz@internet.com.uy # ICQ 5475919
# Ruby en Espa�ol # RUBIES: http://ar.groups.yahoo.com/group/rubies