From: Matthew Moss <matthew.moss@...>
Date: 2008-07-26T12:25:00+09:00
Subject: Re: hexdump (#171)

On Jul 25, 4:34 pm, Chris Shea <cms...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 25, 11:22 am, Matthew Moss <matthew.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >     0000000 6573 2074 6c68 0a73 7973 746e 7861 6f20
> >     0000010 0a6e 6f63 6f6c 7372 6863 6d65 2065 6564
> >     0000020 6573 7472 0a0a 6573 2074 7865 6170 646e
> >     0000030 6174 0a62 6573 2074 6174 7362 6f74 3d70
> >     0000040 0a32 6573 2074 6873 6669 7774 6469 6874
> >     0000050 323d 220a 6573 2074 6574 7478 6977 7464
> >     0000060 3d68 3836 0a0a 2022 2051 6f63 6d6d 6e61
> >     0000070 2064 6f74 7220 6665 726f 616d 2074 6170
> >     0000080 6172 7267 7061 7368 6120 646e 6c20 7369
> >     0000090 2e74 6e0a 6f6e 6572 616d 2070 2051 7167
> >     00000a0 0a7d 0a0a
> >     00000a4
>
> Is this really what you dumped, Matthew? I was hoping for something a
> little more... comprehensible.
>
> Chris
>
> ---
>
> es tlh
> systnxao
> nocolsrhcme eedestr
>
> es txeapdnat
> bes tatsbot=p
> 2es thsfiwtdiht2="
> es tettxiwtd=h86
>
>  " Qocmmna dotr feroam taparrgpasha dnl si.tn
> oneram p Qqg
>

I believe your endianness is off, sir.