From: Massimiliano Mirra <list@...>
Date: 2002-01-11T08:19:16+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] rpkg 0.1 (long)

On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 03:30:45PM -0700, Matt Armstrong wrote:
> > The only issue is that there is no pointer to directories like /var
> > and /tmp, so stuff that would go there on a *nix system won't
> > (personally I can live with that).
> Another weakness of rbconfig.rb is no differentiation between where
> ruby is installed (CONFIG['bindir']) and where add on package binaries
> should be installed (CONFIG[does not exist]).

This should not be too much trouble as we're dealing mostly with
require-able stuff here, i.e. lib, not bin.  

I don't think it would hurt to insert references to local bin dirs in
rbconfig, though.

Massimiliano