From: Jeremy McAnally <jeremymcanally@...>
Date: 2008-07-09T04:29:11+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby without rails?

Ramaze is an excellent choice.  You could also check out my little
framework called Vintage that's very PHP-esque except in Ruby.  I
don't have database stuff "in the framework" but you can set it up and
still use it inside of it.

--Jeremy

On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Shashank Agarwal <shashank_hi@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Thank you all for the wonderful suggestions. :). I've started looking
> into Ramaze, and it definitely seems more manageable than Rails. I need
> to connect to a database, so Webby went out, while I couldn't find a
> good tutorial for Merb. I looked at Ramaze's screenshots and it
> certainly seemed something that I could handle. But thank you once
> again. I was very lost before this (and even thought of using PHP once
> (phew)). :)
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>
>



-- 
http://jeremymcanally.com/
http://entp.com

Read my books:
Ruby in Practice (http://manning.com/mcanally/)
My free Ruby e-book (http://humblelittlerubybook.com/)

Or, my blogs:
http://mrneighborly.com
http://rubyinpractice.com