From: "Peña, Botp" <botp@...>
Date: 2008-07-04T10:14:18+09:00
Subject: Re: thoughts on a more generic Array#partition function

From: Rick DeNatale [mailto:rick.denatale@gmail.com] 
# Not exactly the same, values doesn't guarantee the desired 
# ordering by key. Ruby 1.9 orders hashes by insertion history, 
# Ruby < 1.8.7 doesn't order them
# at all, not sure about 1.8.7

current test:

1.9   not sorted
1.8.6 not sorted
1.8.7 sorted

i prefer 1.8.7 default behaviour

kind regards -botp