From: Robert Dober Date: 2008-07-03T02:40:53+09:00 Subject: Re: Ranges and Enumerable problems On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Adam Shelly wrote: > Some odd behavior arises because > (s<=>s.succ) != -1 for all s. Is that so?????? I guess you mean there exists an s for which ... Cheers Robert -- http://ruby-smalltalk.blogspot.com/ --- AALST (n.) One who changes his name to be further to the front D.Adams; The Meaning of LIFF