From: tony_hammond@... Date: 2002-01-07T23:27:52+09:00 Subject: Re: the [ruby-talk] is gone? I'm seconding this. The simple prefix "[ruby-talk]" is an wonderfully simple rule set for this (human) agent. I only wish more lists would signal where they're coming from through the subject line. (Program my mail client? - You must be joking.) Tony David Alan Black cc: Subject: Re: the [ruby-talk] is gone? 07/01/2002 13:39 Please respond to ruby-talk Hi -- On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Tobias Reif wrote: > Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote: > > > > |is it possible to keep the ruby-talk but remove the message number so > > |they can still use threading? > > > > I felt it's too verbose without numbers. If you really want it, I can > > configure the server in a minute. > > > That would be really great: threading should work, and users know which > email is from which group. I would definitely prefer having [ruby-talk] at the beginning, rather than nothing. Isn't this pretty standard (without numbers)? For example, Yahoo groups put [groupname] at the beginning of subject lines in the email copies of posts. David -- David Alan Black home: dblack@candle.superlink.net work: blackdav@shu.edu Web: http://pirate.shu.edu/~blackdav