From: Sebastian Hungerecker <sepp2k@...>
Date: 2008-05-24T20:29:05+09:00
Subject: Re: Module.===(X,X) is false

calfeld@mac.com wrote:
> What I propose/question is extending the definition to include the
> case that Foo == Foo.  Is there a good reason not to include this case
> as true?

x = String
case x
when String
  puts "x is the string #{x}"
when Class
  puts "x is the class #{x}"
end

This prints "x is the class String". With your change it would print
"x is the string String".

HTH,
Sebastian
-- 
Jabber: sepp2k@jabber.org
ICQ: 205544826