From: Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Date: 2008-05-24T04:52:29+09:00
Subject: Re: Module.===(X,X) is false


On May 23, 2008, at 10:55 , calfeld@mac.com wrote:

> What I propose/question is extending the definition to include the
> case that Foo == Foo.  Is there a good reason not to include this case
> as true?  Are there any plans to have this be true in future versions?

No plans that I know of, but you're free to propose it on ruby-core@.  
It'll go farther if you're able to offer a patch, but that isn't  
strictly necessary.