From: calfeld@...
Date: 2008-05-24T02:55:49+09:00
Subject: Re: Module.===(X,X) is false

Let me further clarify.  I understand how this is false under the
current definition.  For a class Foo, Foo is not an instance of Foo or
of a descendent of Foo.

What I propose/question is extending the definition to include the
case that Foo == Foo.  Is there a good reason not to include this case
as true?  Are there any plans to have this be true in future versions?

c.